NEW Under Armour® Rut Scent Control Pants for Men
Sale price:
Clearance price:
Starting at:
Sale starting at:
Clearance starting at:
Reg. price:
- Under Armour scent control technology
- Ultra-quiet 335-weight fleece
- Front and rear pockets
- Helps reduce odor; does not guarantee 100% odor elimination
Under Armour Scent Control Technology:
- Dual-action technology fuses odor-trapping Zeolites with Anti-Microbial Silver
- Traps odor and suppresses the growth of odor-causing bacteria
- Works 10X longer than carbon
- Is quieter and lighter than carbon
- Reactivates during a normal wash cycle
Under Armour® Rut Scent Control Jackets for Men sold separately and can be found through item search for item number 38-873-047-03
Rated 4.6 out of 5Â by 5
reviewers.
Rated 5 out of 5Â by jdevries best pants ive ever owned
bought these pants from bass pro in calgary and i love them, they are warm, quiet and well made. I will be buying another pair of these pants again. Under Armour puts out a superior hunting product.
April 8, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5Â by WRANGLER30 GREAT PANTS
FIT PERFECT BOW HUNTED IN A TREE STAND 15 MPH WIND AND 31 DEGREE TEMPERATURE STAYED WARM POCKETS WORK GREAT
November 15, 2012
Rated 4 out of 5Â by TheKehoeShow Quite baggy
I love the quality of the pants however they are a little long and baggy and for my 5'-5" frame I'd prefer a 30" inseam instead of a 32".
October 12, 2012
Rated 5 out of 5Â by Jbd1 Excellent investment
All under armour is pricey and these pants are no exception but like all under armour it's worth every penny. The pants fit well and are warm. Hunted in the low 30's with under armour scent control insulated base layer and kept warm. Both pants and jacket are very very quiet.
October 8, 2012
1 Question | 2 Answers
Outdoor Answers
Get help about this item from fellow customers.
Ask your questions. Share your answers.
Answers
A:Â
They run pretty true. I normally wear a 34 waist so I got a 36 to have room to layer underneath. The 36 are right on and I have room for my base layer and fleece pants.A:Â
Larger. I'm 5'-5" and the 32 is baggy on me1 of 1
1 of 1




 Expand All
 Collapse All
(read all my Q&A)


